Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Etxeondo

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep. Consensus is not to delete. Suspected COI issues on the part of the creator can be handled at WP:COIN. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 21:09, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Etxeondo

 * – (View MfD)

No improvements to address the issues found when Draftified. COI concerns, due to author ignoring multiple requests on their Talk page. 1292simon (talk) 21:59, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. Not a valid reason to delete.  The unilateral draftification is bad enough. No reason to do anything. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:22, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

I don´t understand what is the reason for delete my article. Like I said, I am not part of the company and not received any pay. The first article was the same that the spanish version and was deleted. This time, I have created a new aticle with new sources, more reduced and neutral if possible. Seraphimblade told me that I can not create in mainspace myself and is true, was a mistake by ignorance and now I am waiting for a rewiew to know if it is approved like an article for mainspace. Thanks.(Alvaro-gorrocha (talk) 11:44, 20 September 2020 (UTC))
 * Alvaro-gorrocha, the problem is that companies and their products are held to a very high standard for minimum independent coverage. It's about the best sources that provide independent commentary on the product.  "Independent" is usually the critical word, on which these topics fail.  Your difficulty in understanding is easily attributable to your inexperience in editing articles.  You should get experiencing adding sourced content to articles before attempting to write a new article.  On Etxeondo, "Etxeondo" currently has only one mention in all of Wikipedia mainspace.  If Etxeondo is not relevant to other articles, it is unlikely to be justified as a new article.  If it is relevant to other articles, but information on the relevance is missing, you should add that information before attempting a new article.  WP:Orphan articles are difficult for newcomers to succeed with.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:33, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
 * SmokeyJoe thanks for your reply. I will wait for the review of the article although I understand that it will not be accepted. In the meantime, I'm going to investigate the transwiki option even though I don't have much free time right now. Thanks once again for your feedback. Alvaro-gorrocha (talk) 06:40, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
 * es:Etxeondo exists. You would likely have more luck transwikiing the es article to en, than to start on en from scratch.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:52, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - Not a reason to delete a draft. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:10, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep as per SmokeyJoe. I don't think this yet would pas the GNG, but some cited sources would contribute to a pass IMO. In any case notability is not at issue here. COI concerns are not a reason to delete, particularly when they are not confirmed and have been denied in this discussion. Editors may make improvements at their own pace. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 14:31, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.