Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Evolution: Criticism

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 08:25, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Evolution: Criticism


Appears redundant with objections to evolution and creation-evolution controversy but is only used for misleading soapboxing. The only source was one to EvolutionNews (a blog of the Discovery Institute, an unreliabe source which was removed). The Draft submission was declined. — Paleo Neonate  – 04:51, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as utter nonsense. Fails WP:V. Also redundant as stated above.Charles (talk) 10:39, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Should we write a new rule: No WP:POVFORKs in DraftSpace.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:43, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes. Reyk  YO!  07:49, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete- as a nonsense POVFORK with no realistic prospect of ever being an article. Reyk  YO!  07:49, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.