Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:ExTravelMoney

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 23:32, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:ExTravelMoney

 * North America1000 06:28, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
 * North America1000 06:28, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Company-motivated advertisement shown clearly by the information and sources, both of which emulate paid press, even if not intended since that's still what it is, the history has shown one particularly motivated user who has a clear involvement, but no signs they made the necessary actions about COI. SwisterTwister  talk  04:59, 27 February 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:28, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I am not sure how to endorse this (am I supposed to use a template or is this enough?) but either way I support it and what said regarding it. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 20:03, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Generally, a preference (i.e. !vote) is bolded and followed by a rationale. So in this case, a good way to endorse the opinion of SwisterTwister would be "Delete per SwisterTwister." or "Delete per nom." (using italics instead of bold in my examples so they don't appear like !votes, bold is three apostrophes instead of two; nom is an abbreviation for nominator). One of those would be placed on a new line beginning with a bullet (i.e. "*"), possibly followed by a short statement, and ended with a signature. Many of the ways one may !vote can be viewed at Deletion process. Best Regards, — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 13:12, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks! --TheSandDoctor (talk) 15:30, 15 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete per SwisterTwister. I agree with SwisterTwister. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 15:30, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. no hope of ever being an article  DGG ( talk ) 06:43, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.