Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:FARISHTA SATARI

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 07:11, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Draft:FARISHTA SATARI

 * – (View MfD)

Grandiose stub autobiography. Author is now asking at AFC Help Desk why it hasn't been accepted when Rene Descartes has been accepted. Inquiries at Help Desk are tendentious. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:30, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
 * A7. — HELL KNOWZ   ▎TALK 20:33, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
 * user:Hellknowz, WP:CSD doesn’t apply to draftspace. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:26, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes, I know it doesn't. My point is that it may as well. I don't know what else to say about this potential "article". I can't even tell if the author is serious. "A master of masters in every field and discipline"? No sources, COI, biased content, unsourced BLP content, blocked author. — HELL KNOWZ   ▎TALK 09:51, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is obviously never going to be suitable for article space, so there's no point keeping it in draft. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:16, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. I would defend G11 as applying. Note that the author is blocked. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:29, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete. Just G11 this draft. -- Java Hurricane  04:50, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.