Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:FaceReg

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 23:45, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Draft:FaceReg

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Reads like a blog piece, creator has blogger in username so appears to be treating wikipedia as a place for their blogging. Lavalizard101 (talk) 12:46, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep This doesn't appear to be a blog piece to me, it seems like someone collecting together material to write an article, which is a completely acceptable use of draft space. Yes, it's full of original research, personal commentary and informal writing, but that is completely normal for a newcommers first edit, that just means they need some feedback feedback and/or help. No one is born knowing how to write a Wikipedia article, they need to be shown the style guidelines. Sending someone's first good faith attempt at editing for deletion accomplishes nothing useful and is extremely WP:BITEY, this is most likely going to upset and scare away a potential editor and waste a week of time at MFD. What would have been the harm in leaving this in draft space until the creator either works it into a publishable article or it's deleted via G13? If I had come across this and felt the need to do something I would have left the creator a talk page message telling them that we already have an article on facial recognition (although the creator might be writing about the FaceReg software?) pointing them to the teahouse and explaining a few guidelines. 192.76.8.80 (talk) 14:36, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - This is not ragpicking in the usual sense, because this appears to have been nominated for deletion from the draft new page feed. Do we need to revise the instructions for new page reviewers of drafts to clarify that we are more tolerant of drafts than of articles because they are, well, drafts?  Robert McClenon (talk) 04:41, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
 * comment: I didn't come to the draft from the draft new page feed I came from WP:UAA after the creators name appeared in the bot-reported section. Lavalizard101 (talk) 21:08, 15 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep WP:Drafts are not checked for notability or sanity, it's not a g11, nor is there any WP:NMFD reason for deletion. Draftspace is noindexed, if not improved this will be taken care of through g13. you may want to consider withdrawing the nomination to save some community time. Regards, 188.232.146.110 (talk) 03:42, 17 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Ignore, leave it for WP:G13. — SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:42, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.