Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Faculty of Law, University of Lucknow

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  redirect to University of Lucknow to allow potential merging with history preserved. If the draft is disrupted again, please let me know and I will salt appropriately. Daniel (talk) 04:43, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Faculty of Law, University of Lucknow

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Draft resubmitted after rejection (see Special:Diff/1051620643/1059203195) for lack of notability, though it is unlikely that the IP who did the new submit, is connected to the draft author,. Rejecting user recommended merging select content into University of Lucknow. –LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄ ) 21:55, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep I think it takes a very strong case that a piece of content being worked on in user space could never become valuable encyclopedic content in order for it to be deleted and I don't see that here, at least not right now. Merging useful content into University of Lucknow and moving on is fine, but otherwise I'd say leave it alone until it's clear it could never serve a purpose. Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 05:11, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to University of Lucknow. disruptively resubmitted after rejection by blanking decline notices, and no evidence of notability independent of the university. A redirect will allow content to be merged from the page history. 192.76.8.80 (talk) 10:56, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt for bad faith. While there used to be some improvements made by, as of 9 August, everything since then has been resubmits and deletions of AFC declines and rejections, showing that the author doesn't have any more good faith to fix the draft to make it notable, nor agreeing to include a short section at the main university page. The author should work on the University of Lucknow section pertaining to the Faculty of Law and expand that, and then present a split proposal showing independent notability of the faculty. The verbiage itself on the article is still rather promotional and peacock language about how great the faculty are and using honorifics throughout. I know that's not really a concern for a draft in progress but even that hasn't even been cleaned up since August in preference to tendentious resubmitting. AngusW🐶🐶F  ( bark  •  sniff ) 23:49, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Salting Draftspace titles is worse than pointless. SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:31, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect per 192. They were already told to merge this, and they will still be able to do so post-redirect, but resubmission at this point is just tendentious. I don't see a need for preemptive protection of the redirect, but I'd watch it just in case semi proves neccessary in the future. Regards, 213.193.27.121 (talk) 16:03, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep: Suitable content for mainspace, just not necessarily as a standalone article. At worst, redirect to University_of_Lucknow and encourage consideration of merging from the history. Draftspace is poorly used for thin spinout topics, but deletion is not the way forward.  SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:30, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
 * , the suitable content would have to be rewritten to a section, not the monstrosity that is currently there, and that can be done directly in the mainspace article. AngusW🐶🐶F  ( bark  •  sniff ) 01:08, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:29, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.