Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Family Tree Made Simple

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete due to repeated resubmission. Salting is typically reserved for repeated recreation, which doesn't appear to be the case here. RL0919 (talk) 18:39, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Family Tree Made Simple

 * – (View MfD)

This draft is being tendentiously resubmitted by the originator, who is removing rejection notices. Probable conflict of interest.

This draft has already been rejected: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Family_Tree_Made_Simple&type=revision&diff=933510176&oldid=933508678&diffmode=source

The rejection notice was removed https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Family_Tree_Made_Simple&type=revision&diff=933511262&oldid=933510176&diffmode=source

The rejection notice was restored https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Family_Tree_Made_Simple&type=revision&diff=933514470&oldid=933511262&diffmode=source

A comment was removed: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Family_Tree_Made_Simple&type=revision&diff=933517897&oldid=933516561&diffmode=source

In view of the history, deletion and salting of the title seem appropriate, and either a warning or a block for the author (but this is a content forum). Robert McClenon (talk) 16:33, 1 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment - This was posted by the author to my talk page. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:54, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Advertisement?
 * Please tell me where you see and advertisement? If so, then I see many more advertisements here too: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_genealogy_software — Preceding unsigned comment added by Midibo (talk • contribs) 16:38, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Comparison of genealogy software is largely justified by the collection of blue links, as a navigation tool for existing notable articles. It is entirely possible that some or many of the genealogy softwares is not notable and needs deletion.  That would be achieved on a case by case basis.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:12, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
 * I started here: Articles for deletion/Ahnenblatt.  I bet nearly all fail WP:CORP.  If so, to be fair, all should be deleted.  Wikipedia is not a directory of genealogy software.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:34, 1 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete: This has no hope of ever becoming an article (does not even remotely satisfy the general notability guideline), and only serves as a waste of AFC reviewers' time due to the author resubmitting it. Glades12 (talk) 18:29, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete, even G11 eligible. The page promotes commercial software, includes multiple links to their site, and includes zero suitable sources for starting an article, sources that are reliable, independent of the product, and comment directly on it.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:15, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment - First, thank you to User:SmokeyJoe for addressing the other stuff exists argument by nominating one of the items of other stuff for deletion. Second, I will restate that this draft is here at Miscellany for Deletion not for notability concerns, which are not the issue here at MFD, but because the submitter has been tendentious by resubmitting the draft over and over.  Third, the fact that some of the other software articles should be deleted is a reason to nominate them for deletion, as SmokeyJoe has done, not a reason to contest this nomination.  Robert McClenon (talk) 00:32, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.