Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Federal Justice Cultural Centre

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: keep. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 18:57, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Federal Justice Cultural Centre


This draft was not improved nearly 1 year but tagged promising draft in February. Maybe hoax? Hhkohh (talk) 13:36, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - [//www.google.com/search?q= Clearly exists] and draft is indeed promising. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 04:04, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Why do you think this draft is indeed a promising draft, can you give me a reason? Hhkohh (talk) 03:54, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Sure, I am happy to do that. However, it is not really relevant because age alone has long been held as not a reason to delete something here at mfd and I have already shown that the only other deletion argument presented so far (i.e. "maybe hoax?") is inapplicable. But I digress: The subject meets WP:NBUILD, reliable sources likely exist (especially when considering non-English sources), and the prose seems neutral in tone and content. I could go on but that seems like enough. The main thing missing is good inline citations. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 05:38, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep because I consider most of the use of the Promising Draft tag to be abuse, simply leaving crud forever, but there is no reason to delete. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:00, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.