Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Fifty & Fabulous

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 16:11, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Fifty & Fabulous


Didn't know where else for this to go, so feel free to tell me to buzz off. Repeatedly submitted without adding any references despite being told to multiple times. Drewmutt ( ^ᴥ^ ) talk  16:50, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment - Something needs to be done when a submitter persists in resubmitting without taking reviewer advice (to add sources). That can be either deleting the draft or a block.  We are already here at MFD, therefore:
 * Delete. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:57, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
 * User:TonyBallioni’s RfC says that resubmissions without improvement means deleteable at MfD. Here, the author made a number of edits, but I agree that the reviewer comments were ignored, the edits are not improvemt but just more stuff, and I think the community agree that this means it should now be deleted. SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:53, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes, the RfC language said substantiatial improvement. What the means is up to MfD participants. TonyBallioni (talk) 00:07, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Drewmutt, certainly not buzz off.  A comment, a wish, provide a diff link showing the author’s edits preceding resubmission that shows a non-improvement, or non-response to clear comments/instructions. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:53, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Here's a diff between Drewmutt's rejection of the submission and the previous rejection, showing no attempt to address the reviewer's concerns, and here's a diff between the previous two reviews, again showing no improvement whatsoever.
 * Given the above, this should be deleted. ƒirefly  ( t · c · who? ) 12:51, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Is this show the last episode of a 20 part series, all previous are currently in mainspace? —SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:18, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.