Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:First and second fundamental theorems of invariant theory

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Moved to mainspace. Now pout of scope for MfD. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 03:47, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Draft:First and second fundamental theorems of invariant theory

 * – (View MfD)

Draft that circles around the CSD:G13 whirlpool repeatedly. Last substantial change was on 6 August 2018 of a single reference. Prior to that the last substantial change was January 2017. Author refuses to accept outside assistnace to help determine what is necessary to get it to mainspace, Author creates a WP:DICTDEF page un-cited, and the draft doesn't even help us understand why WP resources should be expended to house this WP:NOTWEBHOST content Hasteur (talk) 00:44, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
 * I withdraw this MFD, as the author has elected to move this to mainspace . I further note that because they have moved it to mainspace, it is now subject to Mainspace criteria and CSD.  Finally I vehemently oppose any return to Draft namespace without a firm commitment to a no REFUND permissible G13 clock.  Either it sinks or swims. Hasteur (talk) 01:14, 9 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Has been moved to mainspace: I was planning to move it today to mainspace. -- Taku (talk) 01:02, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
 * I reject you were planning on moving it today. I suspect you only noticed it when I started going about nominating for deletion. Hasteur (talk) 01:14, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
 * If you look at my edit history, for the last few days, I have been finishing drafts like one in a few days. This was in queue for today. — Taku (talk) 02:58, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
 * User:Hasteur - I know that his claim that he was planning to move it today seems like it shouldn't be believed, but his contribution history does show that he really was using article space as a dustbin today, moving dusty stubs into article space. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:44, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.