Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:First draft

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 03:48, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Draft:First draft


Maybe invented/hoax or maybe just not notable Legacypac (talk) 02:32, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Cryptokitties. Content fork. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:06, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
 * does not add anything, and a pointless draft title. Legacypac (talk) 03:14, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Redirects are cheap. There is some edit history that the user may come back looking for.  The redirect points the user in future revisits to the article he needs to read and improve.  These are little points granted, but they are not pointless. Also, redirecting things like this to the most related mainspace article saves wasting space at MfD.  —SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:47, 27 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete, as you can see from the edit history the original draft was about something completely different. If you're so concerned about the other user then you should be concerned about that one too. &mdash;Xezbeth (talk) 05:32, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
 * No, hadn't noticed two topics, by separate authors, in the history. The first is for Regina Barzilay, the second for Cryptokitties.  Both draft authors are not authors of the mainspace articles, but there looks to be no connection.  Delete the draft as more trouble than it is worth.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:52, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.