Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Fitzhugh Mullan

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 07:35, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Fitzhugh Mullan


These are two almost identical copies of an autobiography. The issue is not academic notability. The subject, as a member of the National Academy of Medicine, almost certainly satisfies notability. The issues are tone, and persistent submission. This draft is better than most autobiographies, because the subject is notable, but it isn't likely to be accepted as long as the author and the subject are the same person. Recommend that these two copies be deleted, and that the title be extended-confirmed protected in draft space and article space, so that a neutral article can be accepted. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:40, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.