Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:GTMO

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:02, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:GTMO


A move to mainspace over GTMO redirect was rejected, so this Draft DAB is not much use. Legacypac (talk) 13:52, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
 * "rejected" where?
 * Delete as a bad DAB page. All listed topic are derived from and directly linked from the Primary Topic.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:21, 31 July 2017 (UTC)


 * I put in a Requested Move. I'm not a DAB expert but your response was consistent with the rejection. So ya, delete it as not useful. Legacypac (talk) 09:33, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
 * You did a WP:RMTM? Yeah, no logs are kept from rejections there.  I'd have said "delete" there if I saw it.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:38, 31 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Actually I CSD'd redirect at GTMO with a request to move the Draft over the existing redirect. but declined. I should have been more clear. Legacypac (talk) 09:43, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
 * (ec) No worries. Superficially it looked OK.  You did this to be told "(disagree. Everything at the draft is a WP:PTM except that one.)".  I find it humorous, in a funny humorless way.  RM is so riddled with jargon it is a wonder it ever gets new people.  Fortunately, ordinary editors need not engage the the RM backroom processes.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:49, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.