Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Gagan Randhawa

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. ‑Scottywong | [converse] || 20:15, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Gagan Randhawa

 * – (View MfD)

Pure promotional article. Even if the subject is notable, the page would have to be wholly rewritten. Doesn't seem explicit enough in its promotion though to warrant G11. However, its been resubmitted after being already outright rejected and no significant improvements were made. Sulfurboy (talk) 03:10, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - Rejection was developed, partly at the request of MFD, in order to be final, to limit repeated tendentious resubmission. Resubmission after Rejection is disruptive enough to require MFD as the next step.  This is a wounded animal that was already shot once and needs to be shot again.  Lead bullets should suffice; silver bullets should not be needed.  Robert McClenon (talk) 07:57, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.