Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Ganesh Aloney

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 13:17, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Ganesh Aloney

 * – (View MfD)

another potential blp problem. Or should I be bold, and delete them just giving blp as the reason?  DGG ( talk ) 05:13, 24 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete as G11. --Randykitty (talk) 17:03, 24 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - Wikipedia is not a web host. This is not the draft of anything that could conceivably become an article. -- Whpq (talk) 20:12, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete another draft autobio now that it is here, although it isn't worth bringing these drafts here when they aren't submitted. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:18, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete as an unsourced BLP. Should be BLPPROD-able.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:09, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete This is the latest in a long series of "drafts" I've seen lately that provide a good case for expanding A7, U5, or BLPPROD to drafts. I'm stumped by the claims that there's no problem and we should let MfD handle them, or even worse, just leave them and wait for G13. Adam9007 (talk) 02:32, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete: G11  Java Hurricane  15:46, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Question for User:SmokeyJoe - Are you suggesting that BLPPROD be expanded to include unsourced BLP drafts? Robert McClenon (talk) 18:45, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * They already have: Wikipedia_talk:Proposed_deletion_of_biographies_of_living_people Adam9007 (talk) 18:53, 25 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Question to User:SmokeyJoe - You seem to be saying that draft BLPs that are unsourced and are not likely to be sourced should be deleted. Should the policy on drafts be clarified to that effect? Robert McClenon (talk) 18:45, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes, but at this stage, I’m saying it is a good reason for deletion at MfD. Let’s see if it is always a good reason.  Only BLPs.  —SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:16, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I agree that it would important to know if there are cases that look like this at first but which actually could be a viable article. I think I do remember a few similar during NPP article space, where I happen to spot the name of something, but I can recall only products and books, not living people. And even so, an admin doing deletions of any  Prod is at least supposed to do a quick check, rather than act mechanically.  DGG ( talk ) 06:45, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.