Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Garalina (Video game company)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 06:46, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Garalina (Video game company)


Hoax draft based on a non-existent company. Abequinn14 (talk) 19:53, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Abequinn14, use WP:CSD If an obvious hoax, or explain why you think it is a hoax. I think an explanation is needed for this. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:13, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment - It looks like a subtle hoax, with the statement that the United States ordered a suppression of every game every produced and the scrubbing of public records. This is the stuff of a conspiracy theory.  I don't believe it.  Robert McClenon (talk) 17:56, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment - The overwriting of portions of the text, which was done in version 1 by the author, appears to be intended to further the idea of censorship. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:56, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete as a hoax that isn't obviously false but common sense says is false. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:56, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment - Do a Google search on Garalina, and you will find web pages that appear to support the idea that Garalina is a fictional company created as part of the backstory for Petscop, and suggest that there is a campaign, especially on Reddit, to publicize this company that probably never existed. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:02, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete I can't find anything to suggest this is real. Natureium (talk) 02:09, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
 * User:Abequinn14 - Please follow up with your explanation as to why this is a hoax. I agree that it is a hoax.  Robert McClenon (talk) 21:59, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment - I can't find anything to suggest that it is real, but I can find a lot to support that it is a calculated unreality meant to appear real. (In words of 4 letters, a hoax, but a clever one, not a stupid obvious one.)  Robert McClenon (talk) 21:59, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. Hoax or whatever, it doesn’t belong here anyway. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:22, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.