Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Garchomp

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. ✗ plicit  13:58, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Garchomp

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

This Pokemon species is being resubmitted for review disruptively. It has been declined three times and then rejected twice, and has now been resubmitted again on 10 September 2021. Robert McClenon (talk) 08:06, 10 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:56, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, re-submission following rejection. —  csc -1 00:13, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
 * WP:SILVERLOCK it for 6 months - This allows a legitimate attempt on the article without constant resubmission from what appears to be IP users. If the article does not make it within six additional months, then a deletion is warranted. (Oinkers42) (talk) 19:07, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'm the guy who made that draft. I don't think I've touched it in well over a year, so I'm really confused as to who keeps resubmitting it and... why? I'd support a deletion since it's just sitting there gathering dust, I don't have any plans to do anything further with it, and apparently it's being used disruptively to boot. ShinyDialga777 (talk) 19:11, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NMFD as tendentiously resubmitted, turned away 5 times including two rejections and will obviously not become an article. Regards, 81.177.3.8 (talk) 16:35, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.