Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Garena Free Fire Config File

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 13:47, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Garena Free Fire Config File

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Delete per WP:NOTGUIDE as it shows the overview and the guide for using config(uration) files in a mobile game. Lunar Eclipse Blood Moon 08:37, 8 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Smells like CSD to me, so delete Casspedia  ( talk )  21:35, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep needed to be declined, was declined and should now be ignored. I'm not sure it's intended to be a guide, I'm not even sure what it's intended to be at all, however WP:Drafts are not checked for notability or sanity. It will never be an article, but the author hasn't repeatedly resubmitted it without improvement nor is it borderline speediable and unless the creator is a sock I have no idea what csd you're refferring to hence there is no reason to nominate it here see WP:NMFD. This is junk but nearly everything in draftspace is junk, because it's noindexed no one will ever stumble across the junk, and it's automatically cleaned by g13 after 6 months so the junk can be trashed without needing to waste time in mfds. We've been here before  and this looks like more WP:RAGPICKING sorry if that's overly blunt but garbage like this is best ignored. Regards, 31.41.45.190 (talk) 01:48, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
 * By CSD, I was referencing WP:CSD. I feel that this article is too "unambiguously promotional" for Wikipedia, that's why. Casspedia  ( talk )  02:00, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Doesn't look like a WP:G11 to me, which only applies to pages that are exclusively promotional, and remember the csd are to be narrowly construed. Don't get me wrong it's a bit spammy, but not IMO enough to qualify for a g11. Anyway links are nofolllowed by default and hence do nothing for seo, and the noindexed means that no one ever sees promotional drafts anyway, unless of course someone nominates one for mfd. Regards, 31.41.45.190 (talk) 02:06, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak delete per WP:NOT, with a trout to the nominator for not simply leaving a perfectly harmless draft be. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:23, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete as per Extraordinary Writ and as per Wikipedia is not a guidebook, but could have been left alone. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:43, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete per WP:NOTGUIDE. —  csc -1 20:48, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak delete per "well, we're here"/WP:NOTBURO. (I see 31 still likes my essay, which makes me happy.) Nominations like this aren't particularly useful for anyone, though, so it's better to just leave these articles. Vaticidalprophet 02:44, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Very weak delete - I don't much care for these types of MFDs, but I guess it is what it is.--WaltCip- (talk)  13:04, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep No real reason to nominate this, it was already declined so there's no need to delete it before the normal 6 month period. Jackattack1597 (talk) 15:27, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.