Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Generation Z: A Generation For Change

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep. No consensus for deletion; G13 can get it if it isn't turned into an acceptable article. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 23:53, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Generation Z: A Generation For Change

 * – (View MfD)

Author intends to write a POV essay about Generation Z instead of any kind of useful Wikipedia article. This should be on a blog site or other web host, not here. AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 03:50, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment - I am not persuaded that this needs deleting, or that it is beyond being worked into some form in which it can be used. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:17, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
 * weak keep This is a long way from any valid article, but i don't see any need to delete it at this point, particulrly when it was declined less than 24 hours ago, and the submittor may not even have seen the decline feedback yet. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 08:20, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
 * , it's been declined twice as essay. I suppose I could put a reject / stop sign instead. I didn't want to waste the submitting editor's time and think that continuing to developing a POV essay is the way forward. Again, it looks like more of an essay for a class assignment than anything resembling a Wikipedia article.  If that is the title of an existing news article or book, then it could be contextualized in that manner, but I don't see that.  AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 16:41, 21 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your feedback. The intention was not a POV essay, though I understand where you are all coming from and am working towards improving the page to read as an informative encyclopedia article, as was intended. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WPSC250 (talk • contribs) 03:09, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Then,, you would be well advised to rewrite this into a more acceptable format promptly. Wikipedia articles summarize in factual and descriptive terms what has been written in reliable sources about a topic. They do not offer opinions or make arguments. A minor point, please do not attach source citations to section headers, but only to actual text in the draft. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 15:12, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

‎
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.