Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Gerovital Cosmetics

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 17:11, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Gerovital Cosmetics


This draft has been submitted five times by a paid editor for Gerovital. This draft violates several Wikipedia policies, including being promotional and being a content fork from Gerovital. The existing Gerovital article is interesting in that it is perhaps too hard, too anti-quack, with respect to a quack product. The answer may be to rework the existing article to be negative but a little less negative, not to put so many negative judgments in the voice of Wikipedia. However, this draft is nothing but puffery for a quack product. Robert McClenon (talk) 08:30, 12 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete not useful since we have a page on this topic. Legacypac (talk) 08:56, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Promotional content fork. CoolSkittle  (talk) 09:09, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.