Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Gert van Wyk

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 19:41, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Gert van Wyk


Unimproved since 2015. No refs or evidence this is a notable topic. Legacypac (talk) 20:11, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: not viable as an article, IMO, due to lack of notability and could likely never progress beyond its current state. None of the awards mentioned would likely result in significant coverage to satisfy the WP:GNG. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 03:11, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. AustralianRupert (talk) 03:23, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.