Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Giftxoxo

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  delete. Ricky81682 (talk) 08:11, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Giftxoxo


Advertorially-toned draft article ("It was founded with the realization of coupons and gift cards being the preferred choice of reward systems within the gifting space, adopted by corporate" -- whatever "the gifting space" means), which has been resubmitted at AFC seven times in three weeks. The problem here is that each time the draft is rejected for reading like an advertisement, the creator makes one minor edit (such as changing a source or making a spelling correction) which fails to actually address the reasons it was rejected, and then immediately resubmits it again in the same fundamentally advertorial form as the last time. And while I can't prove it outright, both the writing tone and the creator's persistence in resubmitting it over and over again strongly imply that they have a direct conflict of interest. This has crossed the line into pointless disruption, and it needs to stop. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 22:13, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Being tendentiously resubmitted without being made into a neutral article about a company. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:26, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
 * 'Delete per nom. No value to the goals of the project. Legacypac (talk) 03:09, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.