Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Girls Athletic Association

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep. Or "no consensus" I guess as it's 2-1 in favour of keeping and apparently there is disagreement if a notable topic could be extricated from here, with no killer arguments on either side. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:49, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Girls Athletic Association


This draft has a strange history. It was moved to article space twice and moved out of article space twice, the second time by me. I noted that it was not ready for article space and might not be ready for article space. It is not clear whether it is about a particular Girls' Athletic Association at a school, Girls' Athletic Associations in general, or girls' athletics in general. Like most drafts with an unfocused topic, it does not satisfy notability (as well as not having an obvious title, which is important in an encyclopedia). It was left alone for six months and tagged for G13, but then G13 was declined by User:RoySmith to discuss. After discussion, we agree that MFD is the best course, and recommend deletion after allowing community comment. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:22, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep, leave for standard AfC processes, which means leave it for another six months for G13 if no one rescues it or take ownership (userfies). There is no rationale for deletion. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:36, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment - The rationale for deletion is that it was abandoned for six months and tagged for G13 but rescued by an admin for discussion. The conclusion of the discussion is that it should be deleted unless someone wants to userfy it.  Robert McClenon (talk) 00:59, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Where is the discussion that someone wants? Did they open a discussion, or is this hypothetical?  Or was it just a gut feel and hesitation?  For a gut feel and hesitation, it is well within rights and intentions of the G13 process that anyone may for any reason edit the page to postpone G13 deletion.  What is not logical is that someone's hesitation shall mandate a 7-day deadlined community discussion, this is a misuse of MfD.  There is nothing strange enough about this to warrant bringing it to MfD, or have I missed the point of disagreement between you and Roy?  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:17, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep per SmokeyJoe. It looks like there is potential for at least one notable article (maybe more) to emerge from this draft, as it seems to be trying to be an overview of Girls Athletics Associations and I see absolutely no reason why this needs to deleted before anyone has had a chance to do that if they want. Thryduulf (talk) 12:50, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.