Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Giyani Community Radio

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: keep. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 03:01, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Giyani Community Radio


Draft about a non-notable radio station that has been declined, tagged for G11, despammed, and then G11 was declined after despamming. Not much left after despamming. Original looked like typical undisclosed paid editing; if so, this is still UPE. Unlikely that any amount of looking for sources will make this notable. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:49, 25 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment if the Giyani article had a media section for local radio and television stations or newspapers, this could redirect there. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 21:51, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge might be a good solution, if any of the sources are reliable and support even the fact of the station's existence. If it is paid editing it's a bit incompetent ("It will be on air by July 2013"), more likely cut & paste from an old press release. Pinging for an opinion. Espresso Addict (talk) 23:40, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
 * This could also redirect to List of radio stations in South Africa as listed there. Radio station exists per other local newspapers.    AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 23:56, 25 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep but require good sources because generally radio stations get pages per WP:BROADCAST. Legacypac (talk) 00:56, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the ping. We need to address the UPE with the editors. It's the sort of questionable notability page that might be improved with sources. Current sourcing is inadequate for an article. So redirect to list if sourcing can be found.  Dloh Cier  ekim  13:32, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. Leave for standard AfC processes including G13.  Properly decline G11.  If not G11-eligible, it doesn't need to be deleted faster than G13 provides.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:24, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.