Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Global Knowledge

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. MER-C 17:13, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Global Knowledge


This draft by a paid editor on a marginally notable or non-notable company was Rejected on 26 February 2019, as reading like an advertisement, and as not satisfying corporate notability as written from the corporate viewpoint. It has been trimmed, and now contains less fluff than it did, but is just a shorter puff piece, and was resubmitted rather than discussing. It still has been reference-bombed with low-quality sources, including the company's own web site, and Wikipedia.

This draft with its current author will never satisfy corporate notability. Recommend deletion, and Extended-Confirmed Protection in draft space and article space. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:50, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete and ECP. Paid crap. CoolSkittle  (talk) 20:08, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete: ordinarily I would err on the side of maintaining the history because it includes a paid editing disclosure, however, it's clear that WP:CORPDEPTH hasn't been met, and if it was, another person, less involved and less... paid would be better placed to write it considering the amount of promotionalism in the draft.   SITH   (talk)   11:23, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.