Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:GoLookUp

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Speedy Deleted (G11) by RHaworth. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 18:50, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Draft:GoLookUp


Declined 6 times for poor sources. This page has wasted enough reviewer time now Legacypac (talk) 03:13, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
 * The sources are not hopeless. The website has recevied coverage.  Reviewing this would be hard and will waste even more time.  Decline per WP:NMFD.  Remove the AfC tags and talk to the author.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:58, 20 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete - The sources in the article are IMHO useless as the majority make no mention of the article (and those that do are "scam detector" websites ....), There's a lot of online sources inregards to them launching but that's about it ..... There doesn't seem to be anything else thereafter and as such I personally would say this is a non notable company and if sent to AFD it too would be deleted, Declined 6 times and if kept it'd be declined a lot more. – Davey 2010 Talk 14:01, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - I think I'd have tagged as an ad. KJP1 (talk) 08:13, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - I don't understand the comment of User:SmokeyJoe, but I do understand his comment that some things should be sent to G11 bye-bye. "Remove the AFC tags and talk to the author"?  Dump dump dump.  Robert McClenon (talk) 19:36, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
 * . My apologies. "Remove the AFC tags and talk to the author"?  I don’t know where that came from, it is a comment applicable to an inept but AGF worthy userpage.  I didn’t clue in to this page being promotionally motivated, not sure why not it now looks pretty obvious.  Delete because it is promotion, not due to the nominators rationale.  I see you’ve tagged it G11.  —SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:52, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.