Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Golden Section Technology

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 04:07, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Golden Section Technology

 * – (View MfD)

A non-viable draft resubmitted twice. No chance of meeting WP:NCORP. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:34, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - G11 was declined in what appears to be misreading of the CSD by admin. Since it looks like G11, that is reason enough to delete when we are here.  Robert McClenon (talk) 03:11, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete correctly tagged as advertising on review and G11 incorrectly declined. I just rejected it so it is out of the review pending until we can get it deleted here. Legacypac (talk) 04:30, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Snow/Speedy delete as a G11 declined on an incorrect premise. Alpha3031 (t • c) 12:47, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.