Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Google PageSpeed Tools

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 13:24, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Google PageSpeed Tools


Non-notable technology, article created by a user now indef blocked for undisclosed paid editing. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:19, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep What the draft needs is a removal of the WP:HOWTO content. This product may ultimately become notable (as is often the case with Google's products) and thus deletion serves no purpose. Since this is only a draft, the WP:TOOSOON argument too does not apply. 103.6.158.193 (talk) 17:28, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Really? Because as a draft created probably in violation of Wikipedia's Terms of Use, it should be deleted. The product may become notable, in which case then, and only then, should a draft be created by a legitimate, uninvolved user. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:31, 16 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom and because draft is redundant to copy in article space at Google PageSpeed Tools. —teb728 t c 19:14, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
 * In that case, this draft should be redirected to the mainspace article, not deleted. 103.6.158.193 (talk) 10:39, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
 * No, because the draft was not used to create the actual article. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:44, 19 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as redundant to Google PageSpeed Tools. No redirect needed as per User:Joseph2302. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:29, 20 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.