Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Grant Horsfield

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Consensus is to keep, but seeing as the AfD resulted in delete AND the original nom was merely for housekeeping reasons, no prejudice against re-nomination for other reasons at a later date. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 20:00, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Grant Horsfield


Housekeeping. Exists in mainspace at Grant Horsfield Gbawden (talk) 12:42, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Delete as per my comment below Dom from Paris (talk) 17:25, 26 June 2018 (UTC)  as I have undeniable off-wiki proof that the article creator is an undeclared paid editor but most probably acting in total good faith, when this version has been deleted I shall draftify the mainspace article to allow it to go through AFC as per WP:PAID. Dom from Paris (talk) 13:28, 26 June 2018 (UTC)  striking to avoid confusion with comment below Dom from Paris (talk) 09:10, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
 * So why have you requested deletion of the mainspace article at Articles for deletion/Grant Horsfield saying that this draft should be reviewed at AFC? Thincat (talk) 16:57, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Damn you're right! I got mixed up between this article and another one! Keep this article so it can be reviewed as per my nomination on the other one...that would make a load more sense! (self trout) Dom from Paris (talk) 17:25, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Oh, yes, I can understand that (there's very little I understand at MFD). Thincat (talk) 17:47, 26 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep as above. Thincat (talk) 17:47, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Neutral - Unfortunately, I don't see a good argument for deleting from draft space. The subject is just another non-notable businessman who thinks he is notable or has hangers-on who think they are notable.  In draft space, can be left alone.  Robert McClenon (talk) 23:00, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Speedy redirect to Grant Horsfield, wait for Articles for deletion/Grant Horsfield, and if that results in "delete" then delete this draft. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:51, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
 * WP:Speedy redirect does not apply because the target is undergoing a deletion discussion of its own; otherwise, drafts can be sneakily deleted that way through gaming. I suggest letting this draft likely be deleted "naturally" through G13. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 16:56, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Speedy redirect was the first reaction, before I saw the target was already at AfD. If the mainspace articles are deleted as WP:UPE promotion, so should the draft be.  If not deleted, redirect.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:37, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.