Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Great St Bartholomew

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: soft delete. WP:REFUND applies if sources are available. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 01:07, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Great St Bartholomew


Tagged as a "promising draft". I question notability and see no sources or interest in the page by the creator. Legacypac (talk) 09:40, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Apologies! We are still interested in this page, and I have just updated it further to reflect intervening events. We have simply been overwhelmed in recent months by the process of appointing a new priest. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.176.24.2 (talk) 12:12, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Great but still no sources. What makes this parish WP:Notable? The info presented is best covered on the organizations own website or blog. Legacypac (talk) 18:43, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.