Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Grim Text Editor

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 19:38, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Grim Text Editor


Has been declined 9 times by four different editors. No independent sources at all, doubtful any exist. Submitter just removing notices from article, talk page and resubmitting. WP:COI promoting own product WP:NOTHERE KylieTastic (talk) 13:06, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
 * YET-ZIO(Creator of Draft Article): If my ar3ticle looks like an adv, then what about this article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gobby, One more thing: these editors are not looking and checking correctly at the references added and are just copy, pasting other editors comments by not doing their work you gave to them wasting wikipedia's precious time. I would recommend a honourable editor to edit my article, so these editors will accept. I just want to contribute to wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by YET-ZIO (talk • contribs) 13:12, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Gobby is also flagged for deletion review (See Other stuff exists). I did check the references, as I'm sure David.moreno72, Heliosxeros and Velella did - none are independent reliable sources - just the products own github and own website. Try reading what me require as independent sources rather than just deleting KylieTastic (talk) 13:28, 15 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete I have looked at the references mentioned in the draft, they are not from independent third-party sources. The MasterConsole blog is from someone who uses the same name as the creator of this draft. I'm not saying they are the same person, just there seems to be a COI. The rest of the references are from github which appears to be a web hosting and web developers site. There is zero indication of notability. The editor has had 9 times to try to correct the information. As for Gobby see Other stuff exists. I say with the disruption continued to be caused by this editor salting may apply-- VViking Talk Edits 13:26, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - No improvement between submissions which has become disruptive. Easily fails WP:GNG. Delete and WP:SALT. David. moreno 72    13:29, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

So can i assist any other editor who can make the article right as based on the wikipedia policies. I have already posted COI in my user page and then only made the draft article. The Github repository is the developer's open-source page as based on Grim Text Editor software, its license, releases, etc and the blog also belongs to him and also is listed by himself. Is that not verifiable? — Preceding unsigned comment added by YET-ZIO (talk • contribs) 13:40, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Sounds like worthy software. It belongs in a directory and on websites, but it is not for an Encyclopedia. Maybe, if there were indepdent critical reviews comparing and contrasting with other products, but there are not. At best WP:TNT. Reviewers should be able to reject with this finality without mfd. I wish. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 16:14, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - I have not reviewed the sources, but this isn't AFD. I do see the history of stripping out the record of declines and of tendentious resubmission.  If a volunteer editor wants to blow it up and start over, let them.  Meanwhile delete.  Robert McClenon (talk) 18:46, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.