Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Haunting of 45 Pipitea Street

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:43, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Haunting of 45 Pipitea Street


unsourcedOR, and totally inapppropriate  DGG ( talk ) 17:42, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete - There is no reason to think that this author will develop an acceptable draft from this topic. The topic might or might not be notable, but this draft is unsourced and is written as opinion rather than from a neutral point of view.  I would have preferred some effort to explain to the author, but that probably would have been useless.  Author is either floundering or foundering, not sure which.  Reads like an essay containing original research, not even a particularly good class paper.  Robert McClenon (talk) 19:36, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. This is not what Wikipedia is for.  WP:NOR. WP:NOTADVOCACY. They can use Facebook. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:28, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete as irredeemable original research. The entire draft is based on the author's personal experience and interviews.  That's not fixable.  -- Whpq (talk) 21:24, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.