Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Horizen (platform)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Delete. RL0919 (talk) 04:37, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Horizen (platform)


Another non-notable crypto company with problematic refs see Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard Legacypac (talk) 21:28, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete: promotional 'cruft. --K.e.coffman (talk) 05:37, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete as more cryptocrud. Robert McClenon (talk) 07:21, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Question - Has any restriction been imposed on cryptocrud other than general sanctions, which permits administrators to impose harsh penalties? Is there any rule that penalizes creation or authorizes deletion?  Robert McClenon (talk) 07:21, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete: Since there are no blanket guidelines for deletion of Cryptocoin related junk (that I'm aware of), we have to do this the old fashioned way. ☆ Bri (talk) 02:44, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.