Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Hugh Ned Brown

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: speedy keep. my error  DGG ( talk ) 18:09, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Hugh Ned Brown


No evidence of notability and therefore no chance at an article. The two items listed are not books, or even really published works, but posters he prepared as an in-house illustrator. Not everyone who is included in a university archive is notable. Sometimes they will include representative local figures.  DGG ( talk ) 03:11, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I've published more then the subject. Legacypac (talk) 05:00, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep The inclusion of his papers in a significant archive indicates notability. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:58, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm also having difficulty in understanding this nomination, shortly after DGG wrote in request to a contested PROD: "since anyone can nominate it for AFD before you have chance to improve it, Ive [sic] restored it to Draft space ss Draft:Hugh Ned Brown, which will give you 6 months to do that. When you think you have done enough, you can send it for review, or just move it back yourself, or ask me--and asking me to look at it there is I think the best course." (emboldening mine). Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:03, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.