Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Hurricane Genevieve (2020)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Speedy Redirect (non-admin closure). Whpq (talk) 21:17, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Hurricane Genevieve (2020)

 * – (View MfD)

Per talk page, it appears that this is had been made in a mistake, as the article has been created before the draft gets submitted for creation. One of the editors who has been highly involved in the draft, Seaotter26705 is calling for deletion of this draft (It says: Just delete it then, we might want to work faster next time). I'm considering for a CSD, but given the track record of my CSD's lately i think MfD is better venue for now.  SMB9 9thx   my edits  02:48, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy redirect. WP:SRE.  This draft had a lot of content before the mainspace page acquired content after being a redirect.  This is a common accidental content fork, and is fixed by redirecting.  There appears to be no attribution failures.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:40, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment Speedily redirecting the draft after looking at precedents leading to WP:SRE policy. I will remember it for the future as i want to slow down to reflect on deletion tag abuses and finally work on my articles. As i was involved, i cannot close this discussion.  SMB9 9thx   my edits  08:57, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect appears ✅. Was a good redirect and now needs a closer. Lightburst (talk) 16:53, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.