Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:I aM wEiRd RiGhT

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  speedy delete. CSD G3 Liz Read! Talk! 06:16, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Draft:I aM wEiRd RiGhT

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Has no sources, and sounds opinionated, which Wikipedia is not for I.hate.spam.mail.here (talk | contributions) 23:27, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Not worth taking this to MfD, G13 takes care of this stuff eventually. SK2242 (talk) 00:20, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Content seems to be the reader is weird, therefore weak delete as per G10. Otherwise, let it rot for 6 months. Traveler • chat 01:07, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - Would need rejecting if submitted. As per above poster, "let it rot for 6 months".  Robert McClenon (talk) 04:07, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
 * G3 as vandalism - see also the talk page. 163.1.15.238 (talk) 15:19, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I didn't notice the talk page. Thanks for bringing this up. I.hate.spam.mail.here (talk | contributions) 02:26, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete G3 This isn't even worthy of MfD (JayPlaysStuff &#124; talk to me &#124; What I've been up to) 01:51, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per G3; the talk page has also been tagged for speedy deletion per G1, as it is nothing but a wall of gibberish. –LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄ ) 04:54, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.