Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Idegu Ojonugwa Shadrach

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 00:33, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Idegu Ojonugwa Shadrach

 * – (View MfD)

Promotional draft profile of a non-notable writer and his non-notable writings. WP:G11 nomination removed by a user who might not be the creator. —teb728 t c 11:07, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Adding also drafts of his works. —teb728 t c 11:13, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete All - Many of the drafts are syntactically valid and have no semantic content. None of these will ever be Wikipedia articles, or make it through the review process.  I have no way of knowing whether the author will ever satisfy author notability, but the current draft is far too long to be reviewable.  Just send this whole package to a null device.  Robert McClenon (talk) 17:48, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete All with conditions This looks like a classic case of "way too soon, probably never, keeping these around is wasting everyone's time."
 * My "conditions" are that
 * 1) the wiki-code be made available by email to the major contributor(s) upon request so they can host it elsewhere, and
 * 2) IF and WHEN a new draft is written about any of these topics WHICH CLEARLY SHOWS THE TOPIC HAS A REASONABLE CLAIM OF NOTABILITY - not that it would pass AFC, but that it would have at least a fighting chance - the original can be restored for topic- and history-merging. I don't see this condition being met any time soon, if ever.
 * As an alternative to condition 1, "courtesy blank for 4-26 weeks to allow primary contributors time to make a copy, then delete, no 'G13-undeletion-on-request' as this is a deletion discussion." davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)  16:22, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: not helpful to Wikipedia. If the writer needs a REFUND by email then there's no reason to deny that but if they don't have off-wiki backups then that's poor planning. — Bilorv ( talk ) 01:00, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.