Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:In the Hell of Dixie

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. JohnCD (talk) 15:06, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Draft:In the Hell of Dixie

 * Articles for deletion/In the Hell of Dixie (film) — Preceding unsigned comment added by SmokeyJoe (talk • contribs) 05:11, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Articles for deletion/In the Hell of Dixie (film) — Preceding unsigned comment added by SmokeyJoe (talk • contribs) 05:11, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

An article which was taken to a a deletion discussion for lack of notability, and then saved and draftified for the creator to work on it. However, the creator (a single purpose account) has not edited since December 2015 (his or her entire editing career spanned 4 days). There doesn't seem to be any prospect of this ever becoming an article. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 19:10, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Not just an SPA, but a COI too. From the article creator's userpage, he is Eric F. Adams and is the only person in the production company. The article says "The film was written, produced, directed and edited by Eric F. Adams, who also stars in the film." I had discussions with the article creator in the hopes that we could save the article but he's obviously given up, and did not respond to a ping 3 months ago (5 months after his last activity). I have to agree with User:JamesBWatson that there does not seem an livelihood of this ever becoming an article. A guy and his buddies made a bad file, and sent a few copies of it out. Not notable. Meters (talk) 04:19, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Initial impulse "Replace with Inactive userpage blanked", allowing the good faith assumption that the author will not unblank it without making serious efforts to bring it up to scratch. Averse to deleting because the AfD (Articles for deletion/In the Hell of Dixie (film)) does not show a consensus to delete.  It does show concerns of serious problems, but not so great that the versions can't exist in the history of a userpage.  COI is not a reason to delete.
 * ... Not completely convinced that JamesBWatson and Meters are right, but they probably are ... probably should be deleted. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:20, 17 August 2016 (UTC)  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:20, 17 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.