Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Inovair

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. ℯ xplicit  05:21, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Inovair


Pure advertisement. G11 was declined, but there is no reason to permit material of this sort to stay in WP,even in draft space. Appears to be a direct copy of their sales material "our proven durability"... etc.  DGG ( talk ) 22:29, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete spam. Legacypac (talk) 22:56, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. I understand the decline, it is not quite a G11, effort has been made to make it look like a proper article, a nicely written History section for example. It is, however, a hopeless WP:CORP failure, completely lacking independent commentary. I think CORP and BLPs should have the onus put on the author to immediately substantiate WP:Notability, as I suggest at Wikipedia_talk:Notability. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:58, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Blatant spam. We  are certainly not that  desperate for articles that we need to even consider saving such an obvious abuse of Wikipedia. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 23:39, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as spam.  The entire article reads like a pastiche of press releases.  --Whpq (talk) 02:42, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.