Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Iowa Lakes Community College

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 10:20, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Iowa Lakes Community College


Abandoned draft. Because never formally submitted to AFC, doesn't qualify for G13 speedy. There is a better draft at User:Kurtisokc/Iowa Lakes Community College that I would like to move in place of this abandoned draft. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:50, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Are you requesting deletion of the draft space item so that the user space item can replace it? If so, why not simply accept the the user space draft and move it to article space?  It's short but decently written.  Placing it in article space would allow more visibility for improvement. -- Whpq (talk) 21:08, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

✅ Robert McClenon (talk) 03:06, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
 * The existing draft can still be deleted, because it has been superseded by a better start article.


 * Delete per above. New article could perhaps do with some more independent refs, but for me it looks OK. Better than the one I deleted as promo. Peridon (talk) 13:00, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - we can delete Draft:Iowa Lakes Community College (the version in Draftspace) as it is now Redundant... there is an actual article on the school in Mainspace (See: Iowa Lakes Community College.) As for the version in Kurtisokc's userspace, ask him/her if it is still needed/desired and act accordingly. Blueboar (talk) 14:49, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
 * SFAIK, that's what's been moved into article space. Any redirect left behind could be deleted. Peridon (talk) 17:23, 5 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment - Yes, I accepted Kurtioskc's draft by moving it to mainspace. The redirect from user space to mainspace is in my view harmless and can be left there unless the user requests deletion.  The only question at this point in my mind is whether to delete the stale draft.  Robert McClenon (talk) 19:15, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Robert, "stale" is probably the wrong word to use ... the problem isn't that this page is "stale". The problem is that it is redundant (since an article in Mainspace exists). Blueboar (talk) 20:10, 8 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.