Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Iraqian economic influence in 2023

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. Salvio giuliano 19:30, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

Draft:Iraqian economic influence in 2023

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Article created by ChatGTP or similar tool, with the typical issues: at first glance, it perhaps seems like a well-fleshed out article, but on closer look, it is a very dubious mix of unrelated tidbits and misinterpreted (or copyright-violated) sources. For example, the complete last paragraph of the lead has nothing to do with Iraq but is about the US.

The lead line "The goal of the American invasion of Iraq in 2003 was to end Saddam Hussein's [1]dictatorial rule and eliminate weapons of mass destruction (WMD)" is way too close to "U.S. forces invaded Iraq vowing to destroy Iraqi weapons of mass destruction (WMD) and end the dictatorial rule of Saddam Hussein." and ignores the "oops, no WMD" issue.

"Increasing the progressiveness of payroll taxes, eliminating regressive exemptions, and strengthening tax and customs administration are just a few of the ways Iraq's economic policies aim to diversify government revenue." No, this is a close paraphrase of, a preliminary summary of an IMF report with recommendations, not an actual representation of "Iraq's economic policies". This line is followed by "Iraq's economy has been stabilized and reformatted by the Coalition Provisional Authority in accordance with market principles." Well, yes, in 2004, directly after the invasion. It has nothing to do with the previous statement or 2023. Don't get me started at the completely disjointed next sentence...

The next section, "the effects of the Federal Reserve's tightening monetary policy on US inflation in 2022" has nothing to do with this article.

Further: "Additionally, open-source intelligence methods like basic and advanced Internet search techniques can assist in comprehending the current circumstance and anticipating developments in the foreseeable future": sourced to this 2012 pdf, relevance here: zero. Why the section "the potential economic influence of Iraq in 2023" restarts nearly identical midway through is not clear, it repeats the same nonsense in different words.

Overall, it is a typical example of the goodlooking rubbish AI produces, and we should get rid of it. Fram (talk) 17:15, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete for the reasons stated by the nom. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 17:36, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per the nomination. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 18:49, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete for being an unreliable and unuseful document. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 20:19, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment - It would really be helpful if we had some type of essay that highlights the need to single out and delete AI-generated drafts or articles, since right now WP:NDRAFT would suggest that this be kept even though it's close to patent nonsense. I know there's been a huge discussion on the Village Pump about drafting some type of policy or guideline along those lines. --🌈WaltCip - (talk)  20:33, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
 * we have a draft something at WP:LLM —Alalch E. 22:03, 26 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete: Per the nomination. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:15, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. —  Sundostund  mppria  (talk / contribs) 20:26, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Thanks, for linking that draft PG.--🌈WaltCip - (talk)  14:46, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. NW1223&lt;Howl at me&bull;My hunts&gt; 15:35, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. ~ Pbritti (talk) 15:37, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Should we create a new CSD category for this situation? Newyorkbrad (talk) 20:10, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
 * See discussion on this. Conclusion was that it wasn't ripe for creation yet. Need multiple AfDs that show the need, and perhaps it needs to wait until a chat bot policy is in place. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 21:16, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - crap is crap even if it sounds okay -- Whpq (talk) 21:31, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.