Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Isima Odeh

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. — xaosflux  Talk 02:45, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Isima Odeh


This draft has been submitted for review 19 times over the past four months (I've never seen a draft resubmitted this often), and has been declined each time. After each decline, the contributor has removed the previous decline notifications. I think this adds up to tendentious resubmission of a draft that has no realistic chance of ever passing review at AfC. /wiae /tlk  21:34, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I blocked the editor indefinitely. Editor didn't even wait six minutes before resubmitting it. The antics are also at Draft:Africa facts zone as well. No comment on whether to keep the draft around. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 00:34, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Support the block. NB "indefinite" is an unfortunate word often misread as "infinite".  The editor just needs to learn how to interact with others, and will certainly be blocked until at least that, happens.
 * Isima Odeh appears to be plausibly notable, and we should be wary of systematic bias against Africa. The problem here is of massive WP:COI.  The subject is notable as a self-promoter, and the editor may well be the subject himself.  However, no matter how serious the COI, it is not a reason for deletion.  The topic may become an article if adopted by an experienced editor, and if editors connected to the subject stop trying to build it using poor sources.  Only a couple of good sources are needed.  Dozens of poor sources hinder.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:25, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Good point, . I'm happy to withdraw this MfD if notability is plausible. The two best sources of the bunch are http://www.signalng.com/meet-isima-odeh-young-entrepreneur-publicist-researcher-big-dreams/ and http://www.thebreakingtimes.com/how-africafactszone-caused-national-radio-station-debate-attracted-the-bbc/. I'm not convinced this is quite enough to show notability yet but perhaps my intuition about notability is too restrictive here. /wiae /tlk  21:12, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
 * It was good to bring this one here. Tendentious resubmission is not OK. I think this is an edge case that could go either way at AfD.  However, I think the most important thing for moving forward is the conversation at User_talk:Vadam24.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:35, 7 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.