Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:JAT Holdings

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  speedy delete. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:06, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Draft:JAT Holdings


This draft is being tendentiously resubmitted with no real improvement. The draft as written doesn't establish corporate notability, but it wasn't declined on that basis. It still reads like an information brochure. The most recent resubmission just made a pointless addition to the end.

The company may or may not be notable, but the authors are not really trying anyway. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:24, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete and I declined it again with the "Not" reason which incorrectly encourages them to fix the page. Legacypac (talk) 04:31, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Actually Speedy Delete G11. It's not even close and the switch in user acct is not helping things. Legacypac (talk) 04:43, 19 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete As fairly hopeless WP:Artspam. The sources that treat in depth are simply rehashings of how wonderful the products are and what a great job the company stakeholders are doing. So it's little wonder the  article content reflects the sources. The piece is promotional without actually delving into notability. Creator did what they could, but had little to work with. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 04:57, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.