Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:JK Llamera

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  no consensus. Rejected drafts don't need to be brought to MfD, but it is an unsourced BLP, but it appears to be an autobiography by the subject, so 🤷🏻‍♂️. RL0919 (talk) 18:12, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Draft:JK Llamera

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Vanity BLP. No sources whatsoever. Appears to be autobiographical. SVTCobra 18:01, 10 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment I go through all of the expiring drafts each day and come across anywhere from 15-30 autobiographies like this, daily, from wannabe rappers, computer engineers, "entrepreneurs", student leaders, the whole gamut of interests. I don't think they all need to go through a deletion discussion. They are more common than you can imagine. This draft will never pass AFC approval and if it gets moved to main space, it'll be tagged for speedy deletion. My inclination is just let them be because the pages are typically abandoned when the page creator gets frustrated with our draft approval process. But that's just my POV, not Wikipedia policy. Liz Read! Talk! 01:32, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * OK, thanks, Liz. Duly noted. I shall not nominate another if I come across one. I only saw this one because it was posted to WP:COIN. Cheers, --SVTCobra 08:16, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

Should I withdraw this or let it proceed since it's already underway? --SVTCobra 20:11, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep as per Liz. This is a draft that isn't bad enough for G11 or G3, and needed declining or rejecting, and was declined, and can be left to expire.  Robert McClenon (talk) 16:33, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: “Delete as an unsourced WP:BLP”. This is a perfectly sound reason to delete a myriad of types of material that is useless for content building, and possibly harmful to a living person.  Note that WP:BLP applies to all namespaces, which include DraftSpace.  SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:39, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment The contents of the said article may be transferred to the user page of the subject of this case, if allowed. NewManila2000 (talk) 14:14, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep needed to be declined, was declined and is now best ignored and left for g13. I don't think this is a good candidate for userfication since it's borderline u5 eligible (frankly it's not far off of g11), although I also acknowledge there are tens if not hundreds of thousands of existing self-promo userpages that are equally bad if not worse that we are safely ignoring due to being noindexed. Anyway if they tendentiously resubmit or tendentiously maintain in draftspace to evade g13 then bring this back here WP:DMFD, otherwise g13 will take care of this without needing to take up further community time in discussion. Regards, 213.193.27.121 (talk) 19:35, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete It is a unsourced WP:BLP.   scope_creep Talk  09:50, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per SmokeyJoe, for BLP reasons. Drmies (talk) 15:58, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment original author posted it in mainspace, and it was moved to draft. A different editor submitted it for AFC reviewing at which it was declined. Original author seems to have multiple issues and warnings about their posts. I would leave it in draft for G13 but slap an autobio tag on it, and also remove sensitive BLP information.  AngusW🐶🐶F  ( bark  •  sniff ) 23:05, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep – the purpose of WP:BLP is to protect the interests of the page's subject, and that purpose is not furthered by deleting worthless drafts written by the page's subject. The interests of the project are furthered by discouraging the unnecessary use of MfD, so I'll !vote to leave this draft for the ever-rolling stream of G13 – the same fate, as has been noted, that many, many similar drafts will inevitably face as well. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:47, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.