Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:JNY.V

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Keep, redirect duplicate. Redirect one to the other; then keep. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 05:41, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Draft:JNY.V


Autobiographical draft article about a non-notable musician. Striker force Talk 19:18, 2 August 2018 (UTC) Recreated version of a previous draft autobiographical article about a non-notable musician, failing both GNG and MUSICBIO. Author deleted previous draft. Striker force Talk 19:31, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment It appears that the author did not delete the previous draft, as its discussion may be found here and the draft, here. Striker force Talk 19:35, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Discussions merged. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 21:10, 2 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Neutral - This hasn't been submitted to AFC and so isn't doing harm. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:48, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Redirect one to the other. If nothing comes of them, the passing bell of G13 will eventually ring. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 07:45, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Why did you delete one of these? Their content differs. You linked this discussion as the reason, however, no consensus has arisen for that action. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 19:10, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Sorry, was out for a couple of days. The names are confusing. I see maybe here a mistake. I also see it has been undeleted. Please ping if you need me. I will respond if available. -- Alexf(talk) 14:22, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Actually, Draft:JNY,V remains deleted (this is a merged nomination; perhaps that is what is causing confusion). — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 20:45, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Ok then. restored. -- Alexf(talk) 21:30, 8 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment - There seems to be a conflict of interest with the author account. Wait until the account is acted on.  If the account is blocked, deletion is in order.  Robert McClenon (talk) 14:33, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Wait...what? I came over here while reviewing your report at WP:UAA, but I don’t see the logic in this argument. A username violation (which I am not 100% convinced of because the argument being made is that this person is not actually notable) does not create a retroactive reason to delete something. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:14, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.