Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:JTa Comics

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  delete. MER-C 08:40, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Draft:JTa Comics


A separate wall garden of drafts related to the Angelman universe of comics and books also made by User:Jaylen2020. All in violation of WP:WEBHOST. They all have internal links to the other pages in Draftspace itself tells me that there is no intention of moving those to mainspace as that would break those links. - Ricky81682 (talk) 07:48, 29 September 2015 (UTC)


 * I am also adding the following:


 * Delete all. Nothing suggests they can be sourced to a level meeting Notability (fiction). -- Sam Sailor Talk! 13:22, 30 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete all. I have searched both for the subjects of these pages, using both the titles and other information such as names of supposed actors listed in the drafts, and I have found no evidence that any of these is mentioned anywhere other than in Wikipedia and Wikipedia mirrors. They appear to be fantasy articles about films that the author of them, Jaylen2020, has dreamt up: in the unlikely event that they actually exist, they are obscure and non-notable, and don't seem to have been actually published anywhere, not even on YouTube. It could even be argued that they qualify for speedy deletion as hoaxes. The editing history of Jaylen2020 makes it clear that he or she has no intention of ever submitting any of his/her drafts for review as articles: he/she is simply using Wikipedia as a free web host to store his/her own pages. As Ricky81682 rightly pointed out above, the links to other draft-space pages confirm that they are intended to stay in drafts space, not to be posted as articles. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:12, 1 October 2015 (UTC)


 * delete all Independent sources, dammit. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:30, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete All: Per all above. -  Neutralhomer •  Talk  • 18:01, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep all. Users should be given leeway to draft content. Terrifying them by deleting everything they've done doesn't help anyone. 166.170.44.22 (talk) 22:26, 2 October 2015 (UTC) Sock of indef blocked user KochTruth. BMK (talk) 05:59, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete all per the comments above. The "keep" vote is not based on policy, and should be ignored.  (Sock?) BMK (talk) 23:05, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.