Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Jade Buxton

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:57, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Jade Buxton


Fails WP:PORNBIO and I doubt the mainstream press is enough to get her over WP:BIO. Anyway this page is abandoned. Bringing here in case someone sees something I'm missing. Legacypac (talk) 11:36, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep This might or might not survive an AfD if moved to mainspace as it stands, but thsa tisn't the standard in draft space. The doumentary coverage makes it at least plausible that this perdson ois in fact notable, so unless an exhaustive search for sources has been done and analyzed publicly spo that we can be confident that the is no reasonable possibility that this would demonstrate notability with additional source research, ther is no valid reason to delete. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 22:48, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.