Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Jadhav theorem

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. Protection is not pre-emptive. If it, or the mainspace articles get recreated let me know. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva` CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:39, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Jadhav theorem

 * – (View MfD)

Fails WP:NFT, could be speedy deleted for WP:A11 if it is were to be published.  Mario Jump  83!  08:36, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. The nomination rationale was exactly my sentiment as well. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:51, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Exactly. Completely unsourced, I can find nothing about this supposed theorem. The editor who created this states that it is unpublished and that there is no news coverage of it, and wants us to keep this around for 6 to 8 months . The user has created this multiple times, and has attempted to link other articles to it. Wikipedia isn't here to promote unsourced unpublished theorems. No response to a userpage post concerning the possible COI, but now IPs are appearing. Assuming this is deleted we may need to block recreation of Jadhav theorem and Jadhav Theorem. Meters (talk) 22:04, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment If this is deleted, then the Draft:Jadhav Theorem should be deleted too.  Mario Jump  83!  00:36, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: an excellent example of what Wikipedia is not: especially a textbook, a social network and a platform for promotion. I suggest a hard delete as a G13 can be reversed on request, and this is completely unsuited for an encyclopedia.  Java Hurricane  03:31, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment Article creator now indef'ed NOTHERE by user: Daniel Case Meters (talk) 06:17, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt. Consider Title Blacklist.  Robert McClenon (talk) 07:24, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and author being WP:NOTHERE blocked. —  csc -1 19:47, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment The consensus here is to have this draft deleted. I also want to note that the creator of this draft made a sock and made it clear that he doesn't want this to be deleted, suggesting that this should be create-protected before more socks are going to appear and re-create this draft.  Mario Jump  83!  01:08, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.