Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Jame John

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 00:05, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Jame John


Completely unsourced. Promotional content and tone. Nothing to indicate current, or likely future, Notability. Tagging for deletion. KJP1 (talk) 07:37, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Either G11 or keep. Referring basic decisions to MfD overwhelms MfD.  —SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:03, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Neutral as per User:SmokeyJoe - Not ready for article space but not bad enough to be G11.  See what happens.  If no work, goes G13.  If repeatedly resubmitted, shoot it.  Robert McClenon (talk) 16:17, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete no credible claim of significance. Normal pastor like many others. Legacypac (talk) 17:11, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.