Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Jared Paul

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 19:45, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Jared Paul


Draft submission has been declined six times; the fifth time was by me. I said then that if it was submitted again without improvement, I would nominate it for deletion. The original author,, apparently wishes it to be deleted. As all five AfC reviewers have said, the subject appears to be non-notable. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:46, 17 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Weak delete, I don't see that Paul makes the cut. New Kids on the Block, sure, but notability is not inherited, and none of the sources discusses Paul himself in any detail. Huon (talk) 13:57, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete apparently hopeless for an article. DGG ( talk ) 19:08, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:GNG. Author has consistently failed to come up with enough credible evidence of notability. While not a reason for deletion per se, a Google search shows that is a paid editor, and they have not responded to the notice I added to their user talk page requiring them to declare themselves as such per the terms of use. They did not defend themselves when I raised this on the COI noticeboard. I see their behaviour as a determination to promote this individual. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 19:15, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.